Wolves have been native to Germany again for several years, and with them, old debates are returning. One of these questions is who is liable for damages when a wolf attacks livestock. 

A recent ruling from the VG Magdeburg sheds light on this and emphasizes the importance of preventive measures.

In this specific case, a farmer believed that a wolf was responsible for the death of a calf. The calf was found in a pasture secured with an electric wire. But is this protection sufficient against wolves?

According to the decision of the VG Magdeburg from 28.02.2017, the injured party bears the burden of proof for a wolf attack in order to assert a compensation claim. The mere assumption of a wolf attack outside confirmed occurrence areas is not sufficient. Furthermore, adequate protective measures must be in place. In this case, the electric wire was positioned at a height of 50 cm, which does not pose a barrier to wolves. The minimum distance from the ground should be 20 cm to effectively deter wolves.

A wolf attack is recognizable by specific characteristics. For example, prey animals are usually killed by a targeted throat bite. The distance between a wolf's canine teeth typically ranges from 30 to 40 mm. A distance of 11 cm between bite marks, as claimed by the plaintiff, does not indicate a wolf.

But what does this ruling mean for the protection of our livestock? 
An important note comes from NRW, where the "Wolf Funding Guidelines" are referenced, which regulate such cases. However, there are concerns in the Hochsauerland region regarding the protection of mouflon. Some fear that the reintroduction of the wolf could accelerate the extinction of this species, as specific protective measures for mouflon are currently lacking.

The debate is heated and far from settled. One thing is clear: the coexistence of humans, wolves, and livestock requires adjustments and a better understanding of the needs and behaviors of all parties involved.